Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tea Tree vs Brighton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Brighton scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tea Tree (925) sits above Brighton (885).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tea Tree edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 885).

Common questionsTea Tree vs Brighton

Common questions

Does Tea Tree or Brighton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tea Tree scores 925 vs 885 in Brighton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Tea Tree or Brighton?

Brighton scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Tea Tree
Metric
Brighton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
11.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
30
464
Population
19,720
44
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
12
925
Avg ICSEA
885

Climate

586 mm
Annual rainfall
586 mm
21.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
21.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).