Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cradle Mountain vs Macquarie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Cradle Mountain scores higher on walkability (8/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Macquarie (945) sits above Cradle Mountain (922).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Macquarie edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 922).

Common questionsCradle Mountain vs Macquarie

Common questions

Does Cradle Mountain or Macquarie have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Macquarie scores 945 vs 922 in Cradle Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cradle Mountain or Macquarie?

Cradle Mountain scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Cradle Mountain
Metric
Macquarie

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$208/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$50/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
Owner occupied
133.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

8
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
152
Population
30
Median age

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
16
922
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).