Side by sideSuburb comparison

Jingili vs Alawa.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $649,000 and $575,000. Alawa edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Alawa (median $575,000) is roughly 13% cheaper to buy into than Jingili ($649,000).

Jingili skews owner-occupied (74%), Alawa runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Alawa is the lower entry point at $575,000 median, 13% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Alawa offers the higher gross rental yield (3.12% vs 2.76%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsJingili vs Alawa

Common questions

Is Jingili or Alawa cheaper to buy in?

Alawa has the lower median house price at $575,000, roughly 13% below Jingili ($649,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Jingili or Alawa?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.12% in Alawa vs 2.76% in Jingili. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Jingili
Metric
Alawa

Price & Market

$649,000
Median house
$575,000
$326,160
Median unit
$240,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$345/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$345/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$340/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

10
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,841
Population
2,078
36
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
985
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).