Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mullewa vs Wongoondy.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Wongoondy skews owner-occupied (78%), Mullewa runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wongoondy has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 48%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Mullewa
Metric
Wongoondy

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$148/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$128/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
356
Population
29
45
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
782
Avg ICSEA
782

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).