Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yandarlo vs Macfarlane.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Macfarlane skews owner-occupied (83%), Yandarlo runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Macfarlane has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Yandarlo
Metric
Macfarlane

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$144/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$144/wk
$122/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$122/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
39
Population
17
26
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
929
Avg ICSEA
929

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).