Side by sideSuburb comparison

Abbey vs Vasse.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Abbey edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Abbey scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Vasse skews owner-occupied (83%), Abbey runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsAbbey vs Vasse

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Abbey or Vasse?

Abbey scores 14/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Abbey
Metric
Vasse

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$410/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,321
Population
2,853
42
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
996
Avg ICSEA
996

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).