Side by sideSuburb comparison

Altona vs Seaholme.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,168,000 and $1,055,000. Seaholme edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Seaholme (median $1,055,000) is roughly 11% cheaper to buy into than Altona ($1,168,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Seaholme (1083) sits above Altona (1060).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Seaholme is the lower entry point at $1,055,000 median, 11% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Seaholme edges out on average school ICSEA (1083 vs 1060).

Common questionsAltona vs Seaholme

Common questions

Is Altona or Seaholme cheaper to buy in?

Seaholme has the lower median house price at $1,055,000, roughly 11% below Altona ($1,168,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Altona or Seaholme have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Seaholme scores 1083 vs 1060 in Altona. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Altona
Metric
Seaholme

Price & Market

$1,168,000
Median house
$1,055,000
$690,000
Median unit
$348,480
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$530/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$475/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
Owner occupied
75.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

30
Walk score
20
Transit score
100
Bike score
Population
2,067
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1060
Avg ICSEA
1083

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).