Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ambarvale vs Glen Alpine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glen Alpine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glen Alpine (979) sits above Ambarvale (973). Glen Alpine skews owner-occupied (91%), Ambarvale runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glen Alpine edges out on average school ICSEA (979 vs 973). Glen Alpine also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAmbarvale vs Glen Alpine

Common questions

Does Ambarvale or Glen Alpine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glen Alpine scores 979 vs 973 in Ambarvale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ambarvale
Metric
Glen Alpine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$380/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$380/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$570/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
7,254
Population
4,429
34
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
973
Avg ICSEA
979

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).