Side by sideSuburb comparison

Appleby vs Oxley Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Oxley Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Oxley Vale (910) sits above Appleby (909). Appleby skews owner-occupied (69%), Oxley Vale runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Oxley Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (910 vs 909). Oxley Vale also has a higher family-household share (72% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAppleby vs Oxley Vale

Common questions

Does Appleby or Oxley Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Oxley Vale scores 910 vs 909 in Appleby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Appleby
Metric
Oxley Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$345/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$335/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
54.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
35
Population
3,935
41
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
16
909
Avg ICSEA
910

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).