Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ardglen vs Chilcotts Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ardglen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ardglen (946) sits above Chilcotts Creek (926). Ardglen skews owner-occupied (94%), Chilcotts Creek runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ardglen edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 926).

Common questionsArdglen vs Chilcotts Creek

Common questions

Does Ardglen or Chilcotts Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ardglen scores 946 vs 926 in Chilcotts Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ardglen
Metric
Chilcotts Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$190/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$480/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
50
Population
16
58
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
9
946
Avg ICSEA
926

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).