Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ashbourne vs Sandergrove.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ashbourne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ashbourne (1019) sits above Sandergrove (997). Ashbourne skews owner-occupied (92%), Sandergrove runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ashbourne edges out on average school ICSEA (1019 vs 997).

Common questionsAshbourne vs Sandergrove

Common questions

Does Ashbourne or Sandergrove have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ashbourne scores 1019 vs 997 in Sandergrove. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ashbourne
Metric
Sandergrove

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$285/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
308
Population
98
46
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
2
1019
Avg ICSEA
997

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).