Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ashby Heights vs Jacky Bulbin Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ashby Heights (963) sits above Jacky Bulbin Flat (961). Ashby Heights skews owner-occupied (92%), Jacky Bulbin Flat runs more rental-dense (37% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ashby Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (963 vs 961). Jacky Bulbin Flat also has a higher family-household share (105% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAshby Heights vs Jacky Bulbin Flat

Common questions

Does Ashby Heights or Jacky Bulbin Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ashby Heights scores 963 vs 961 in Jacky Bulbin Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ashby Heights
Metric
Jacky Bulbin Flat

Price & Market

$790,000
Median house
$240,480
Median unit
-8.7%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$620/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$620/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
92.0%
Owner occupied
37.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
292
Population
58
55
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
8
963
Avg ICSEA
961

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).