Side by sideSuburb comparison

Babbage Island vs South Carnarvon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. South Carnarvon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

South Carnarvon scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 30/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. South Carnarvon skews owner-occupied (60%), Babbage Island runs more rental-dense (23% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

South Carnarvon has a heavier family-household mix (58% vs 46%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBabbage Island vs South Carnarvon

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Babbage Island or South Carnarvon?

South Carnarvon scores 30/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Babbage Island
Metric
South Carnarvon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$209/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$209/wk
$327/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
23.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
62.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
30
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
909
54
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
934
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).