Side by sideSuburb comparison

Badjaling vs Mount Stirling.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Stirling edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Stirling (934) sits above Badjaling (900).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Stirling edges out on average school ICSEA (934 vs 900).

Common questionsBadjaling vs Mount Stirling

Common questions

Does Badjaling or Mount Stirling have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Stirling scores 934 vs 900 in Badjaling. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Badjaling
Metric
Mount Stirling

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$130/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$130/wk
$50/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
26
Population
16
60
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
900
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).