Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bakers Swamp vs Cundumbul.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cundumbul edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cundumbul (894) sits above Bakers Swamp (884). Bakers Swamp skews owner-occupied (74%), Cundumbul runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cundumbul edges out on average school ICSEA (894 vs 884). Cundumbul also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBakers Swamp vs Cundumbul

Common questions

Does Bakers Swamp or Cundumbul have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cundumbul scores 894 vs 884 in Bakers Swamp. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bakers Swamp
Metric
Cundumbul

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$120/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
45.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
60
Population
44
49
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
12
884
Avg ICSEA
894

Climate

414 mm
Annual rainfall
414 mm
33.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
33.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).