Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bakewell vs Zuccoli.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bakewell edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bakewell scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 10/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Zuccoli skews owner-occupied (74%), Bakewell runs more rental-dense (52% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Zuccoli has a heavier family-household mix (82% vs 70%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBakewell vs Zuccoli

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Bakewell or Zuccoli?

Bakewell scores 16/100 on walkability vs 10/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bakewell
Metric
Zuccoli

Price & Market

$484,500
Median house
$257,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$420/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$420/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
52.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
46.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
3,091
Population
4,131
32
Median age
28

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
943
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).