Side by sideSuburb comparison

Banjup vs Hammond Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Banjup edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Banjup (1059) sits above Hammond Park (1046). Banjup skews owner-occupied (86%), Hammond Park runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Banjup edges out on average school ICSEA (1059 vs 1046).

Common questionsBanjup vs Hammond Park

Common questions

Does Banjup or Hammond Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Banjup scores 1059 vs 1046 in Hammond Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Banjup
Metric
Hammond Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$395/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$395/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$410/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
100
1,377
Population
6,985
42
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1059
Avg ICSEA
1046

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).