Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bara vs Cross Roads.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cross Roads edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cross Roads (957) sits above Bara (942). Bara skews owner-occupied (92%), Cross Roads runs more rental-dense (33% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cross Roads edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 942). Cross Roads also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 31%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBara vs Cross Roads

Common questions

Does Bara or Cross Roads have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cross Roads scores 957 vs 942 in Bara. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bara
Metric
Cross Roads

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$306/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
33.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19
Population
19
51
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
942
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).