Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barmaryee vs Yeppoon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yeppoon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Yeppoon scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 22/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Barmaryee skews owner-occupied (95%), Yeppoon runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Barmaryee has a heavier family-household mix (88% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBarmaryee vs Yeppoon

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Barmaryee or Yeppoon?

Yeppoon scores 22/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Barmaryee
Metric
Yeppoon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$620/wk
$500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
3.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
22
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
925
Population
7,037
42
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
993
Avg ICSEA
993

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).