Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barretts Creek vs Coaldale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coaldale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coaldale (911) sits above Barretts Creek (881). Coaldale skews owner-occupied (88%), Barretts Creek runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coaldale edges out on average school ICSEA (911 vs 881). Coaldale also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBarretts Creek vs Coaldale

Common questions

Does Barretts Creek or Coaldale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coaldale scores 911 vs 881 in Barretts Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Barretts Creek
Metric
Coaldale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
12
Population
73
55
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
20
881
Avg ICSEA
911

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).