Batesford vs Hamlyn Heights.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hamlyn Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Hamlyn Heights scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Hamlyn Heights (1043) sits above Batesford (1013). Batesford skews owner-occupied (94%), Hamlyn Heights runs more rental-dense (68% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Hamlyn Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (1043 vs 1013). Batesford also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Batesford or Hamlyn Heights have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Hamlyn Heights scores 1043 vs 1013 in Batesford. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Batesford or Hamlyn Heights?
Hamlyn Heights scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Batesford against another suburb