Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beauty Point vs Beaconsfield.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Beauty Point scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beaconsfield (927) sits above Beauty Point (910).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Beaconsfield edges out on average school ICSEA (927 vs 910).

Common questionsBeauty Point vs Beaconsfield

Common questions

Does Beauty Point or Beaconsfield have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beaconsfield scores 927 vs 910 in Beauty Point. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Beauty Point or Beaconsfield?

Beauty Point scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Beauty Point
Metric
Beaconsfield

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
18.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,285
Population
4,370
57
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
910
Avg ICSEA
927

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).