Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bellarine vs Clifton Springs.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Clifton Springs edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clifton Springs (1027) sits above Bellarine (1019). Bellarine skews owner-occupied (92%), Clifton Springs runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Clifton Springs edges out on average school ICSEA (1027 vs 1019). Bellarine also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBellarine vs Clifton Springs

Common questions

Does Bellarine or Clifton Springs have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clifton Springs scores 1027 vs 1019 in Bellarine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bellarine
Metric
Clifton Springs

Price & Market

Median house
$667,500
Median unit
$441,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$375/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
10
169
Population
7,646
57
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
7
1019
Avg ICSEA
1027

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.3°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).