Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ben Bullen vs Portland.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ben Bullen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ben Bullen (887) sits above Portland (853). Ben Bullen skews owner-occupied (107%), Portland runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ben Bullen edges out on average school ICSEA (887 vs 853). Ben Bullen also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 66%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBen Bullen vs Portland

Common questions

Does Ben Bullen or Portland have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ben Bullen scores 887 vs 853 in Portland. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ben Bullen
Metric
Portland

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$160/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
107.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
71
Population
2,447
55
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
887
Avg ICSEA
853

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).