Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bendick Murrell vs Godfreys Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bendick Murrell edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bendick Murrell (957) sits above Godfreys Creek (940). Bendick Murrell skews owner-occupied (92%), Godfreys Creek runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bendick Murrell edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 940). Bendick Murrell also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBendick Murrell vs Godfreys Creek

Common questions

Does Bendick Murrell or Godfreys Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bendick Murrell scores 957 vs 940 in Godfreys Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bendick Murrell
Metric
Godfreys Creek

Price & Market

$169,000
Median house
$188,640
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
92.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
143
Population
65
56
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
18
957
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).