Side by sideSuburb comparison

Berry Park vs Chisholm.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Chisholm edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chisholm (994) sits above Berry Park (956). Chisholm skews owner-occupied (79%), Berry Park runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Chisholm edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 956).

Common questionsBerry Park vs Chisholm

Common questions

Does Berry Park or Chisholm have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chisholm scores 994 vs 956 in Berry Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Berry Park
Metric
Chisholm

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$427/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$370/wk
$307/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
15
182
Population
4,577
61
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
956
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).