Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beswick Creek vs Jilkminggan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jilkminggan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jilkminggan (735) sits above Beswick Creek (681). Beswick Creek skews owner-occupied (56%), Jilkminggan runs more rental-dense (14% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jilkminggan edges out on average school ICSEA (735 vs 681). Jilkminggan also has a higher family-household share (97% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBeswick Creek vs Jilkminggan

Common questions

Does Beswick Creek or Jilkminggan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jilkminggan scores 735 vs 681 in Beswick Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beswick Creek
Metric
Jilkminggan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$80/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$80/wk
$68/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$48/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
14.0%
Renter occupied
83.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
263
28
Median age
25

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
681
Avg ICSEA
735

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).