Side by sideSuburb comparison

Big Jacks Creek vs Ardglen.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ardglen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ardglen (946) sits above Big Jacks Creek (933). Ardglen skews owner-occupied (94%), Big Jacks Creek runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ardglen edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 933). Ardglen also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBig Jacks Creek vs Ardglen

Common questions

Does Big Jacks Creek or Ardglen have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ardglen scores 946 vs 933 in Big Jacks Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Big Jacks Creek
Metric
Ardglen

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$190/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
61
Population
50
44
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
11
933
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).