Side by sideSuburb comparison

Birmingham Gardens vs Shortland.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Birmingham Gardens edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Birmingham Gardens (1002) sits above Shortland (1000). Shortland skews owner-occupied (56%), Birmingham Gardens runs more rental-dense (40% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Birmingham Gardens edges out on average school ICSEA (1002 vs 1000).

Common questionsBirmingham Gardens vs Shortland

Common questions

Does Birmingham Gardens or Shortland have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Birmingham Gardens scores 1002 vs 1000 in Shortland. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Birmingham Gardens
Metric
Shortland

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$377/wk
40.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
57.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
2,598
Population
4,537
28
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1002
Avg ICSEA
1000

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).