Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bolong vs Back Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bolong edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bolong (962) sits above Back Forest (957). Back Forest skews owner-occupied (94%), Bolong runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bolong edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 957). Back Forest also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBolong vs Back Forest

Common questions

Does Bolong or Back Forest have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bolong scores 962 vs 957 in Back Forest. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bolong
Metric
Back Forest

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$335/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$252/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
34.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
94
Population
91
46
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
18
962
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).