Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bolwarra Heights vs Oakhampton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bolwarra Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bolwarra Heights (984) sits above Oakhampton (983). Bolwarra Heights skews owner-occupied (88%), Oakhampton runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bolwarra Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 983). Bolwarra Heights also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBolwarra Heights vs Oakhampton

Common questions

Does Bolwarra Heights or Oakhampton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bolwarra Heights scores 984 vs 983 in Oakhampton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bolwarra Heights
Metric
Oakhampton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$373/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$373/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
62.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
20
3,436
Population
165
36
Median age
68

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
984
Avg ICSEA
983

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).