Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bon Accord vs Dirnbir.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Dirnbir skews owner-occupied (59%), Bon Accord runs more rental-dense (41% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Dirnbir has a heavier family-household mix (88% vs 71%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Bon Accord
Metric
Dirnbir

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$228/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$228/wk
$194/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
Renter occupied
53.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
20
29
Population
59
51
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
936
Avg ICSEA
936

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).