Boolite vs Sheep Hills
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boolite (966) sits above Sheep Hills (947). Sheep Hills skews owner-occupied (130%), Boolite runs more rental-dense (58% owner).
Buying in Boolite or Sheep Hills?
Selling in Boolite? The free selling guide
Boolite and Sheep Hills side by side
| Measure | Boolite | Sheep Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 58.0% | 130.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 11 | 5 |
| Average ICSEA | 966 | 947 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | – | 0 |
| Transit score | – | 0 |
| Bike score | – | 0 |
| Population | 38 | 27 |
| Median age | 41 | 56 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 366 mm | 366 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.3°C | 31.3°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Boolite edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 947). Boolite also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Boolite vs Sheep Hills: common questions
Does Boolite or Sheep Hills have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boolite scores 966 vs 947 in Sheep Hills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Boolite with
Choosing between Boolite and Sheep Hills?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.