Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boorhaman East vs Boorhaman.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boorhaman edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boorhaman (996) sits above Boorhaman East (983). Boorhaman skews owner-occupied (86%), Boorhaman East runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boorhaman edges out on average school ICSEA (996 vs 983). Boorhaman also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoorhaman East vs Boorhaman

Common questions

Does Boorhaman East or Boorhaman have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boorhaman scores 996 vs 983 in Boorhaman East. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boorhaman East
Metric
Boorhaman

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
13
Population
135
50
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
14
983
Avg ICSEA
996

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).