Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boosey vs Burramine South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Burramine South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Burramine South (987) sits above Boosey (976). Burramine South skews owner-occupied (85%), Boosey runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Burramine South edges out on average school ICSEA (987 vs 976). Boosey also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoosey vs Burramine South

Common questions

Does Boosey or Burramine South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Burramine South scores 987 vs 976 in Boosey. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boosey
Metric
Burramine South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$461/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$291/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
108
Population
24
39
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
6
976
Avg ICSEA
987

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).