Bornes Hill vs Wickliffe

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bornes Hill (1013) sits above Wickliffe (985). Bornes Hill skews owner-occupied (127%), Wickliffe runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

Buying in Bornes Hill or Wickliffe?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Bornes Hill? The free selling guide

Bornes Hill and Wickliffe side by side

MeasureBornes HillWickliffe
Renting
Owner occupied127.0%62.0%
Renter occupied36.0%12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby52
Average ICSEA1013985
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population33123
Median age5653
Climate
Annual rainfall551 mm545 mm
Mean max, January27.1°C27.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Bornes Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (1013 vs 985). Bornes Hill also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Bornes Hill vs Wickliffe: common questions

Does Bornes Hill or Wickliffe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bornes Hill scores 1013 vs 985 in Wickliffe. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.