Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bovell vs Geographe.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Bovell skews owner-occupied (95%), Geographe runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bovell has a heavier family-household mix (92% vs 72%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Bovell
Metric
Geographe

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$360/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
85
475
Population
3,622
46
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
990
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).