Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boxers Creek vs Carrick.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boxers Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boxers Creek (984) sits above Carrick (972). Carrick skews owner-occupied (97%), Boxers Creek runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boxers Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 972). Carrick also has a higher family-household share (95% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoxers Creek vs Carrick

Common questions

Does Boxers Creek or Carrick have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boxers Creek scores 984 vs 972 in Carrick. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boxers Creek
Metric
Carrick

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$290/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
97.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
259
Population
164
44
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
17
984
Avg ICSEA
972

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).