Side by sideSuburb comparison

Brinkin vs Jingili.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jingili edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Jingili scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 10/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Jingili skews owner-occupied (74%), Brinkin runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsBrinkin vs Jingili

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Brinkin or Jingili?

Jingili scores 10/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Brinkin
Metric
Jingili

Price & Market

Median house
$649,000
Median unit
$326,160
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$345/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$345/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
42.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,117
Population
1,841
34
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
985
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).