Side by sideSuburb comparison

Brushgrove vs Lower Southgate.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Brushgrove edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Brushgrove (948) sits above Lower Southgate (937).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Brushgrove edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 937). Lower Southgate also has a higher family-household share (67% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBrushgrove vs Lower Southgate

Common questions

Does Brushgrove or Lower Southgate have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Brushgrove scores 948 vs 937 in Lower Southgate. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Brushgrove
Metric
Lower Southgate

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$298/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
181
Population
112
61
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
11
948
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).