Side by sideSuburb comparison

Brushy Creek vs Guyra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Guyra edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Guyra scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 68/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Brushy Creek skews owner-occupied (80%), Guyra runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Brushy Creek has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBrushy Creek vs Guyra

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Brushy Creek or Guyra?

Guyra scores 68/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Brushy Creek
Metric
Guyra

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
68
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
37
Population
2,003
49
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
949
Avg ICSEA
949

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).