Side by sideSuburb comparison

Buccarumbi vs Chambigne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Buccarumbi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Buccarumbi (923) sits above Chambigne (919). Chambigne skews owner-occupied (91%), Buccarumbi runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Buccarumbi edges out on average school ICSEA (923 vs 919). Chambigne also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 40%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBuccarumbi vs Chambigne

Common questions

Does Buccarumbi or Chambigne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Buccarumbi scores 923 vs 919 in Chambigne. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Buccarumbi
Metric
Chambigne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
70.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
30
Population
48
59
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
13
923
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).