Side by sideSuburb comparison

Buller vs Glenfield.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glenfield edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glenfield (917) sits above Buller (885). Buller skews owner-occupied (80%), Glenfield runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glenfield edges out on average school ICSEA (917 vs 885).

Common questionsBuller vs Glenfield

Common questions

Does Buller or Glenfield have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glenfield scores 917 vs 885 in Buller. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Buller
Metric
Glenfield

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
65.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
159
Population
1,009
48
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
17
885
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).