Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bulliac vs Callaghans Creeks.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bulliac edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bulliac (967) sits above Callaghans Creeks (946).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bulliac edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 946).

Common questionsBulliac vs Callaghans Creeks

Common questions

Does Bulliac or Callaghans Creeks have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bulliac scores 967 vs 946 in Callaghans Creeks. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bulliac
Metric
Callaghans Creeks

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$275/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$275/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$234/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
44
Population
5,608
58
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
17
967
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).