Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bundaberg vs Walkervale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bundaberg edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bundaberg scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 38/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsBundaberg vs Walkervale

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Bundaberg or Walkervale?

Bundaberg scores 100/100 on walkability vs 38/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bundaberg
Metric
Walkervale

Price & Market

$428,000
Median house
$335,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$285/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$242/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$275/wk
Owner occupied
64.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
38
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
84,718
Population
2,981
46
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
951
Avg ICSEA
951

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).