Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bundella vs Coomoo Coomoo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bundella edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bundella (907) sits above Coomoo Coomoo (858). Coomoo Coomoo skews owner-occupied (200%), Bundella runs more rental-dense (32% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bundella edges out on average school ICSEA (907 vs 858). Coomoo Coomoo also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBundella vs Coomoo Coomoo

Common questions

Does Bundella or Coomoo Coomoo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bundella scores 907 vs 858 in Coomoo Coomoo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bundella
Metric
Coomoo Coomoo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$204/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
32.0%
Owner occupied
200.0%
26.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
53
Population
19
47
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
907
Avg ICSEA
858

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).