Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bunding vs Spargo Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Spargo Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Spargo Creek (1032) sits above Bunding (1026). Bunding skews owner-occupied (77%), Spargo Creek runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Spargo Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1032 vs 1026). Bunding also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBunding vs Spargo Creek

Common questions

Does Bunding or Spargo Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Spargo Creek scores 1032 vs 1026 in Bunding. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bunding
Metric
Spargo Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$305/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$259/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
61
Population
42
56
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
16
1026
Avg ICSEA
1032

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).