Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bundjalung vs Woodburn.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Bundjalung scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woodburn (954) sits above Bundjalung (914).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woodburn edges out on average school ICSEA (954 vs 914).

Common questionsBundjalung vs Woodburn

Common questions

Does Bundjalung or Woodburn have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woodburn scores 954 vs 914 in Bundjalung. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Bundjalung or Woodburn?

Bundjalung scores 16/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bundjalung
Metric
Woodburn

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
5
3,203
Population
1,987
54
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
3
914
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).