Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bundure vs Coree.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bundure edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bundure (983) sits above Coree (956). Bundure skews owner-occupied (100%), Coree runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bundure edges out on average school ICSEA (983 vs 956). Bundure also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBundure vs Coree

Common questions

Does Bundure or Coree have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bundure scores 983 vs 956 in Coree. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bundure
Metric
Coree

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$209/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$178/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
43
45
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
8
983
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).