Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bunya vs Cashs Crossing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Cashs Crossing scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 64/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bunya (1071) sits above Cashs Crossing (1049).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bunya edges out on average school ICSEA (1071 vs 1049).

Common questionsBunya vs Cashs Crossing

Common questions

Does Bunya or Cashs Crossing have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bunya scores 1071 vs 1049 in Cashs Crossing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Bunya or Cashs Crossing?

Cashs Crossing scores 64/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bunya
Metric
Cashs Crossing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$470/wk
$650/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
96.0%
Owner occupied
3.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
64
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,968
Population
27,323
43
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1071
Avg ICSEA
1049

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).